William R. Pounders, Judge, Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County v. Penelope Watson (521 U.S. 982)
U.S. Supreme Court · decided June 27, 1997 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)
- Citation
- 521 U.S. 982 · 117 S. Ct. 2359
- Decided
- June 27, 1997
- Term
- October Term 1996
- Vote
- 7–2
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome
- Petitioning party won
- Ideological direction
- Conservative
Opinion excerpt
Per Curiam. In this case the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted respondent’s habeas corpus petition and held invalid on due process grounds her conviction for summary contempt before a state-court judge for conduct in open court. The Court of Appeals misinterpreted the constitutional requirements for imposition of a summary contempt order. We grant the petition for a writ of certiorari and reverse. Respondent Penelope Watson is an attorney who represented William Mora in a multidefendant murder trial in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Los Angeles. The Honorable William Pounders presided over the case, and he is the petitioner here. On April 7, 1994, counsel for one of Mora’s codefendants repeatedly raised in open court the issue of the punishment defendants might receive if they were convicted. Judge Pounders stated that possible punishment “ ‘is not a subject that’s open to discussion. It should not be explored.’ ” App. to Pet. for Cert. 20. Though it is not clear whether this was said at a bench conference only or reiterated in open court, it seems respondent remained at the defense table during the bench conference. Her co-counsel, Joseph Gutierrez, was at the bench on behalf of their client Mora. In later proceedings, Judge Pounders noted that “Miss Watson is no more than six feet away from us when we’re at the side bar…
Excerpt of a 16,136-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.