United States v. Villamonte-marquez et al. (462 U.S. 579)

U.S. Supreme Court · decided June 17, 1983 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)

Citation
462 U.S. 579 · 103 S. Ct. 2573
Decided
June 17, 1983
Term
October Term 1982
Vote
6–3
Majority author
Justice Rehnquist
Issue area
Criminal Procedure
Disposition
Reversed
Outcome
Petitioning party won
Ideological direction
Conservative

Opinion excerpt

Justice Rehnquist delivered the opinion of the Court. Congress has provided that “[a]ny officer of the customs may at any time go on board of any vessel... at any place in the United States . . . and examine the manifest and other documents and papers . . . and to this end may hail and stop such vessel . . . and use all necessary force to compel compliance.” 46 Stat. 747, as amended, 19 U. S. C. § 1581(a). We are asked to decide whether the Fourth Amendment is offended when customs officials, acting pursuant to this statute and without any suspicion of wrongdoing, board for inspection of documents a vessel that is located in waters providing ready access to the open sea. Near midday on March 6, 1980, customs officers, accompanied by Louisiana state policemen, were patrolling the Calca-sieu River Ship Channel, some 18 miles inland from the gulf coast, when they sighted the Henry Morgan II, a 40-foot sailboat, anchored facing east on the west side of the channel. The Calcasieu River Ship Channel is a north-south waterway connecting the Gulf of Mexico with Lake Charles, Louisiana. Lake Charles, located in the southwestern corner of Louisiana, is a designated Customs Port of Entry in the Houston, Texas Region. While there is access to the channel from Louisiana’s Calcasieu Lake, the channel is a separate thoroughfare to the west of the lake which all vessels moving between Lake…

Excerpt of a 66,048-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.

← Back to the decisions database