United States v. Petrillo (332 U.S. 1)

U.S. Supreme Court · decided June 23, 1947 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)

Citation
332 U.S. 1 · 67 S. Ct. 1538
Docket
No. 954
Argued
May 5, 1947
Decided
June 23, 1947
Term
October Term 1946
Vote
5–3
Majority author
Justice Black
Issue area
First Amendment
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome
Petitioning party won
Ideological direction
Conservative

How the Justices voted

Majority
Chief Justice Vinson, Justice Burton, Justice R. H. Jackson, Justice Frankfurter (wrote a concurrence), Justice Black (wrote)
Dissenting
Justice Reed (wrote), Justice Rutledge, Justice Murphy

Opinion on Justia

Opinion excerpt

Mr. Justice Black delivered the opinion of the Court. The District Court dismissed a criminal information filed against the respondent, James C. Petrillo, on the ground that the statute on which the information was founded was unconstitutional. 68 F. Supp. 845. The case is here on direct appeal by the Government as authorized by the Criminal Appeals Act. 18 U. S. C. (Supp. V, 1946) § 682. The information charged a violation of the Communications Act of 1934, 48 Stat. 1064, 1102, as amended by an Act of April 16, 1946. 60 Stat. 89. The specific provisions of the Amendment charged to have been violated read: “Sec. 506. (a) It shall be unlawful, by the use or express or implied threat of the use of force, violence, intimidation, or duress, or by the use or express or implied threat of the use of other means, to coerce, compel or constrain or attempt to coerce, compel, or constrain a licensee— “(1) to employ or agree to employ, in connection with the conduct of the broadcasting business of such licensee, any person or persons in excess of the number of employees needed by such licensee to perform actual services; or “(d) Whoever willfully violates any provision of subsection (a) or (b) of this section shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished by imprisonment for not more than one year or by a fine of not more than $1,000, or both.” 60 Stat. 89. The information alleged that a…

Excerpt of a 29,109-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.

← Back to the decisions database