United States v. Hoffman (335 U.S. 77)

U.S. Supreme Court · decided June 21, 1948 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)

Citation
335 U.S. 77 · 68 S. Ct. 1413
Docket
No. 97
Argued
October 23, 1947
Decided
June 21, 1948
Term
October Term 1947
Vote
5–4
Majority author
Justice Vinson
Issue area
Criminal Procedure
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome
Petitioning party won
Ideological direction
Conservative

How the Justices voted

Majority
Chief Justice Vinson (wrote), Justice Burton, Justice Douglas, Justice Reed, Justice Black
Dissenting
Justice R. H. Jackson (wrote), Justice Frankfurter (wrote), Justice Rutledge (wrote), Justice Murphy (wrote)

Opinion on Justia

Opinion excerpt

Mr. Chief Justice Vinson delivered the opinion of the Court. On Feb. 27, 1946, the Price Administrator filed a petition, in the District Court for the District of Columbia, to institute criminal contempt proceedings against appel-lee. The petition charged appellee with having made numerous sales of used cars at over-ceiling prices in violation of an injunction previously issued by the District Court. A rule to show cause was issued, but was dismissed on motion of the appellee, on the ground that he was entitled to immunity under § 202 (g) of the Emergency Price Control Act from prosecution for the transactions upon which the petition was founded. 68 F. Supp. 53. The Government brought this appeal, under the provisions of the Criminal Appeals Act, to review the decision of the District Court. The main issue is the same as that presented in the companion case, Shapiro v. United States, ante, p. 1, but two additional minor questions are raised: 1. Appellee urges that the appeal was not properly taken by the United States because the Government was not a party to the proceedings in the District Court. The record shows, however, that the litigation was instituted in that court by a petition of the OPA District Enforcement Attorney on behalf of the Price Administrator. When the rule to show cause was issued, the court appointed the United States Attorney and the OPA District…

Excerpt of a 3,093-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.

← Back to the decisions database