Trupiano et al. v. United States (334 U.S. 699)

U.S. Supreme Court · decided June 14, 1948 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)

Citation
334 U.S. 699 · 68 S. Ct. 1229
Docket
No. 427
Argued
March 9, 1948
Decided
June 14, 1948
Term
October Term 1947
Vote
5–4
Majority author
Justice Murphy
Issue area
Criminal Procedure
Disposition
Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part
Outcome
Petitioning party won
Ideological direction
Liberal

How the Justices voted

Majority
Justice R. H. Jackson, Justice Douglas, Justice Frankfurter, Justice Rutledge, Justice Murphy (wrote)
Dissenting
Chief Justice Vinson (wrote), Justice Burton, Justice Reed, Justice Black

Opinion on Justia

Opinion excerpt

Mr. Justice Murphy delivered the opinion of the Court. This case adds another chapter to the body of law growing out of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. That Amendment provides: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” In other words, the Fourth Amendment is a recognition of the fact that in this nation individual liberty depends in large part upon freedom from unreasonable intrusion by those in authority. It is the duty of this Court to give effect to that freedom. In January, 1946, the petitioners sought to lease part of the Kell farm in Monmouth County, New Jersey, and to erect a building thereon. Kell suspected that they intended to build and operate an illegal still. He accordingly reported the matter to the appropriate federal authority, the Alcohol Tax Unit of the Bureau of Internal Revenue. The federal agents told Kell to accept the proposition, provided he did nothing to entice or encourage the petitioners into going ahead with their plans and provided he kept the agents informed of all developments. Nilsen, one of the agents, was assigned in…

Excerpt of a 32,088-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.

← Back to the decisions database