Trump v. New York
U.S. Supreme Court · decided December 18, 2020 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)
- Decided
- December 18, 2020
- Term
- October Term 2020
- Vote
- 6–3
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome
- Petitioning party won
- Ideological direction
- Conservative
Opinion excerpt
(Slip Opinion) Cite as: 592 U. S. ____ (2020) 1 Per Curiam NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash- ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 20–366 _________________ DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL., APPELLANTS v. NEW YORK, ET AL. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK [December 18, 2020] PER CURIAM. Every ten years, the Nation undertakes an “Enumera- tion” of its population “in such Manner” as Congress “shall by Law direct.” U. S. Const., Art. I, §2, cl. 3. This census plays a critical role in apportioning Members of the House of Representatives among the States, allocating federal funds to the States, providing information for intrastate re- districting, and supplying data for numerous initiatives conducted by governmental entities, businesses, and aca- demic researchers. Department of Commerce v. New York, 588 U. S. ___, ___ (2019) (slip op., at 2). Congress has given both the Secretary of Commerce and the President functions to perform in the enumeration and…
Excerpt of a 53,597-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.