Tom Swint, et al. v. Chambers County Commission, et al. (514 U.S. 35)
U.S. Supreme Court · decided March 1, 1995 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)
- Citation
- 514 U.S. 35 · 115 S. Ct. 1203
- Decided
- March 1, 1995
- Term
- October Term 1994
- Vote
- 9–0
- Majority author
- Justice Ginsburg
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome
- Petitioning party won
- Ideological direction
- Conservative
Opinion excerpt
Justice Ginsburg delivered the opinion of the Court. In the wake of successive police raids on a nightclub in Chambers County, Alabama, two of the club’s owners joined by an employee and a patron (petitioners here) sued the Chambers County Commission (respondent here), the city of Wadley, and three individual police officers. Petitioners sought damages and other relief, pursuant to 42 U. S. C. § 1988, for alleged civil rights violations. We granted certiorari to review the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, which held that the Chambers County Commission qualified for summary judgment because the sheriff who authorized the raids was a state executive officer and not an agent of the county commission. We do not reach that issue, however, because we conclude that the Eleventh Circuit lacked jurisdiction to rule on the county commission’s liability at this interlocutory stage of the litigation. The Eleventh Circuit unquestionably had jurisdiction to review the denial of the individual police officer defendants’ motions for summary judgment based on their alleged qualified immunity from suit. But the Circuit Court did not thereby gain authority to review the denial of the Chambers County Commission’s motion for summary judgment. The commission’s appeal, we hold, does not fit within the “collateral order” doctrine, nor is there “pendent party”…
Excerpt of a 29,787-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.