Sessions v. Dimaya

U.S. Supreme Court · decided April 17, 2018 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)

Decided
April 17, 2018
Term
October Term 2017
Vote
5–4
Majority author
Justice Kagan
Issue area
Due Process
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome
Petitioning party lost
Ideological direction
Liberal
Constitutional ruling
Federal law held unconstitutional

Opinion excerpt

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2017 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321 , 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus SESSIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL v. DIMAYA CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT No. 15–1498. Argued January 17, 2017—Reargued October 2, 2017— Decided April 17, 2018 The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) virtually guarantees that any alien convicted of an “aggravated felony” after entering the Unit- ed States will be deported. See 8 U. S. C. §§1227 (a)(2)(A)(iii), 1229b(a)(3), (b)(1)(C). An aggravated felony includes “a crime of vio- lence (as defined in [ 18 U. S. C. §16 ] . . . ) for which the term of im- prisonment [is] at least one year.” §1101(a)(43)(f). Section 16’s defi- nition of a crime of violence is divided into two clauses—often referred to as the elements clause, §16(a), and the residual clause, §16(b). The residual clause, the provision at issue here, defines a “crime of violence” as “any other offense that is a felony and that, by its nature, involves a substantial risk that…

Excerpt of a 195,742-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.

← Back to the decisions database