Securities & Exchange Commission v. Ralston Purina Co. (346 U.S. 119)

U.S. Supreme Court · decided June 8, 1953 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)

Citation
346 U.S. 119 · 73 S. Ct. 981
Docket
No. 512
Argued
April 28, 1953
Decided
June 8, 1953
Term
October Term 1952
Vote
6–2
Majority author
Justice Clark
Issue area
Economic Activity
Disposition
Reversed
Outcome
Petitioning party won
Ideological direction
Liberal

How the Justices voted

Majority
Justice Minton, Justice Clark (wrote), Justice Douglas, Justice Frankfurter, Justice Reed, Justice Black
Dissenting
Chief Justice Vinson, Justice Burton

Opinion on Justia

Opinion excerpt

Mr. Justice Clark delivered the opinion of the Court. Section 4 (1) of the Securities Act of 1933 exempts “transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering” from the registration requirements of § 5. We must decide whether Ralston Purina’s offerings of treasury stock to its “key employees” are within this exemption. On a complaint brought by the Commission under § 20 (b) of the Act seeking to enjoin respondent’s unregistered offerings, the District Court held the exemption applicable and dismissed the suit. The Court of Appeals affirmed. The question has arisen .many times since the Act was passed; an apparent need to define the scope of the private offering exemption prompted certiorari. 345 U. S. 903. Ralston Purina manufactures and distributes various feed and cereal products. Its processing and distribution facilities are scattered throughout the United States and Canada, staffed by some 7,000 employees. At least since 1911 the company has had a policy of encouraging stock ownership among its employees; more particularly, since 1942 it has made authorized but unissued common shares available to some of them. Between 1947 and 1951, the period covered by the record in this case, Ralston Purina sold nearly $2,000,000 of stock to employees without registration and in so doing made use of the mails. In each of these years, a corporate resolution authorized the sale…

Excerpt of a 13,792-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.

← Back to the decisions database