Secretary of Agriculture v. United States et al. (347 U.S. 645)

U.S. Supreme Court · decided June 7, 1954 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)

Citation
347 U.S. 645 · 74 S. Ct. 826
Docket
No. 480
Argued
April 27, 1954
Decided
June 7, 1954
Term
October Term 1953
Vote
5–3
Majority author
Justice Frankfurter
Issue area
Economic Activity
Disposition
Vacated and remanded
Outcome
Petitioning party won
Ideological direction
Conservative

How the Justices voted

Majority
Justice Clark, Justice Frankfurter (wrote), Justice Burton, Justice Reed, Justice Minton
Dissenting
Chief Justice Warren (wrote), Justice Black (wrote), Justice Douglas (wrote)

Opinion on Justia

Opinion excerpt

Mr. Justice Frankfurter delivered the opinion of the Court. Five railroads which transport fruits and vegetables into New York and Philadelphia filed with the Interstate Commerce Commission schedules of charges for unloading services performed by them at these points. Various shippers and shipper organizations, State Commissions, and other interested parties, protested the proposed charges. The Secretary of Agriculture, acting on behalf of the affected agricultural interests, intervened. The Commission in due course approved the charges, 272 I. C. C. 648. On further consideration, the approved charges were cut roughly in half, 286 I. C. C. 119. Complaints against even these reduced charges were then filed with the Commission, but these were dismissed by it on the basis of its prior decision, and this litigation to enjoin and set aside the Commission’s order followed. 28 U. S. C. §§ 1336, 2325. Numerous parties again intervened — the shipper and consumer interests on the side of the protestants, and the carriers involved on the side of the Commission. The three-judge district court, with Judge De Vane dissenting, upheld the Commission, 114 F. Supp. 420. Direct appeals under 28 U. S. C. § 1253 brought the cases here. 347 U. S. 902. The general rule is that it is the responsibility of the carrier, as part of the transportation service covered by the line-haul rate, to “deliver”…

Excerpt of a 17,971-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.

← Back to the decisions database