Schreiber v. Burlington Northern, Inc., et al. (472 U.S. 1)

U.S. Supreme Court · decided June 4, 1985 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)

Citation
472 U.S. 1 · 105 S. Ct. 2458
Decided
June 4, 1985
Term
October Term 1984
Vote
7–0
Majority author
Justice Burger
Issue area
Economic Activity
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome
Petitioning party lost
Ideological direction
Conservative

Opinion excerpt

Chief Justice Burger delivered the opinion of the Court. We granted certiorari to resolve a conflict in the Circuits over whether misrepresentation or nondisclosure is a necessary element of a violation of § 14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U. S. C. § 78n(e). I On December 21, 1982, Burlington Northern, Inc., made a hostile tender offer for El Paso Gas Co. Through a wholly owned subsidiary, Burlington proposed to purchase 25.1 million El Paso shares at $24 per share. Burlington reserved the right to terminate the offer if any of several specified events occurred. El Paso management initially opposed the takeover, but its shareholders responded favorably, fully subscribing the offer by the December 30, 1982, deadline. Burlington did not accept those tendered shares; instead, after negotiations with El Paso management, Burlington announced on January 10, 1983, the terms of a new and friendly takeover agreement. Pursuant to the new agreement, Burlington undertook, inter alia, to (1) rescind the December tender offer, (2) purchase 4,166,667 shares from El Paso at $24 per share, (3) substitute a new tender offer for only 21 million shares at $24 per share, (4) provide procedural protections against a squeeze-out merger of the remaining El Paso shareholders, and (5) recognize “golden parachute” contracts between El Paso and four of its senior officers. By-February…

Excerpt of a 23,325-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.

← Back to the decisions database