Ronald D. Edwards, Warden v. Robert W. Carpenter (529 U.S. 446)
U.S. Supreme Court · decided April 25, 2000 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)
- Citation
- 529 U.S. 446 · 120 S. Ct. 1587
- Decided
- April 25, 2000
- Term
- October Term 1999
- Vote
- 7–2
- Majority author
- Justice Scalia
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome
- Petitioning party won
- Ideological direction
- Conservative
Opinion excerpt
Justice Scalia delivered the opinion of the Court. This case presents the question whether a federal habeas court is barred from considering an ineffective-assistanee-of-counsel claim as “cause” for the procedural default of another claim when the ineffective-assistance claim has itself been procedurally defaulted. I Respondent was indicted by an Ohio grand jury for aggravated murder and aggravated robbery. He entered a guilty plea while maintaining his innocence — a procedure we held to be constitutional in North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U. S. 25 (1970)—in exchange for the prosecution’s agreement that the guilty plea could be withdrawn if the three-judge panel that accepted it elected, after a mitigation hearing, to impose the death penalty. The panel accepted respondent’s plea based on the prosecution’s recitation of the evidence supporting the charges and, following a mitigation hearing, sentenced him to life imprisonment with parole eligibility after 30 years on the aggravated-murder count and to a concurrent term of 10 to 25 years on the aggravated-robbery count. On direct appeal respondent, represented by new counsel, assigned only the single error that the evidence offered in mitigation established that he should have been eligible for parole after 20 rather than BO years. The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed, and respondent did not appeal to the Ohio Supreme Court. After…
Excerpt of a 12,263-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.