Randall C. Scarborough v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs (541 U.S. 401)
U.S. Supreme Court · decided May 3, 2004 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)
- Citation
- 541 U.S. 401 · 124 S. Ct. 1856
- Decided
- May 3, 2004
- Term
- October Term 2003
- Vote
- 7–2
- Majority author
- Justice Ginsburg
- Issue area
- Attorneys
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome
- Petitioning party won
- Ideological direction
- Unspecifiable
Opinion excerpt
Justice Ginsburg delivered the opinion of the Court. The Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA or Act) departs from the general rule that each party to a lawsuit pays his or her own legal fees. See Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society, 421 U. S. 240, 257 (1975). Relevant here, EAJA authorizes the payment of fees to a prevailing party in an action against the United States; the Government may defeat this entitlement by showing that its position in the underlying litigation “was substantially justified.” 28 U. S. C. § 2412(d)(1)(A). In a further provision, § 2412(d)(1)(B), the Act prescribes the timing and content of applications seeking fees authorized by § 2412(d)(1)(A). Section 2412(d)(1)(B) specifies as the time for filing the application “within thirty days of final judgment in the action.” In the same sentence, the provision identifies the application’s contents, in particular, a showing that the applicant is a “prevailing party” who meets the financial eligibility condition (in this case, a net worth that “did not exceed $2,000,000 at the time the . . . action was filed,” § 2412(d)(2)(B)); and a statement of the amount sought, with an accompanying itemization. The fee application instruction adds in the next sentence: “The [applicant] shall also allege that the position of the United States was not substantially justified.” Petitioner Randall C. Scarborough was…
Excerpt of a 38,873-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.