Peters v. Hobby et al. (349 U.S. 331)

U.S. Supreme Court · decided June 6, 1955 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)

Citation
349 U.S. 331 · 75 S. Ct. 790
Docket
No. 376
Argued
April 19, 1955
Decided
June 6, 1955
Term
October Term 1954
Vote
7–2
Majority author
Justice Warren
Issue area
First Amendment
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome
Petitioning party won
Ideological direction
Liberal

How the Justices voted

Majority
Chief Justice Warren (wrote), Justice Harlan, Justice Black (wrote a concurrence), Justice Clark, Justice Frankfurter, Justice Minton
Concurring in the judgment
Justice Douglas (wrote)
Dissenting
Justice Burton, Justice Reed (wrote)

Opinion on Justia

Opinion excerpt

Mr. Chief Justice Warren delivered the opinion of the Court. This action was instituted by petitioner in the District Court for the District of Columbia. The principal relief sought is a declaration that petitioner’s removal and debarment from federal employment were invalid. Prior to trial, the District Court granted the respondents’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. The judgment was affirmed, one judge dissenting, by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, relying on its decision in Bailey v. Richardson, 86 U. S. App. D. C. 248, 182 P. 2d 46, sustained here by an equally divided vote, 341 U. S. 918. We granted certiorari, 348 U. S. 882, because the case appeared to present the same constitutional question left unresolved by this Court’s action in Bailey v. Richardson, supra. I. The basic facts are undisputed. Petitioner is a professor of medicine, specializing in the study of metabolism, at Yale University. For several years prior to 1953, because of his eminence in the field of medical science, he was employed as a Special Consultant in the United States Public Health Service of the Federal Security Agency. On April 10, 1953, the functions of the Federal Security Agency were transferred to the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, headed by respondent Hobby. Petitioner’s duties required his presence in Washington from four to ten days each…

Excerpt of a 47,203-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.

← Back to the decisions database