Naomi Marquez v. Screen Actors Guild, Inc., et al. (525 U.S. 33)
U.S. Supreme Court · decided November 3, 1998 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)
- Citation
- 525 U.S. 33 · 119 S. Ct. 292
- Decided
- November 3, 1998
- Term
- October Term 1998
- Vote
- 9–0
- Majority author
- Justice O'Connor
- Issue area
- Unions
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome
- Petitioning party lost
- Ideological direction
- Liberal
Opinion excerpt
Justice O’Connor delivered the opinion of the Court. Section 8(a)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), 49 Stat. 452, as added, 61 Stat. 140, 29 U. S. C. § 158(a)(3), permits unions and employers to negotiate an agreement that requires union “membership” as a condition of employment for all employees. We have interpreted a proviso to this language to mean that the only “membership” that a union can require is the payment of fees and dues, NLRB v. General Motors Corp., 373 U. S. 734, 742 (1963), and we have held that § 8(a)(3) allows unions to collect and expend funds over the objection of nonmembers only to the extent they are used for collective bargaining, contract administration, and grievance adjustment activities, Communications Workers v. Beck, 487 U. S. 735, 745, 762-763 (1988). In this ease, we must determine whether a union breaches its duty of fair representation when it negotiates a union security clause that tracks the language of § 8(a)(3) without explaining, in the agreement, this Court’s interpretation of that language. We conclude that it does not. We are also asked to review the Court of Appeals’ decision that the District Court did not have jurisdiction to decide a claim that a union breached the duty of fair representation by negotiating a clause that was inconsistent with the statute. We conclude that because this challenge to the union security…
Excerpt of a 32,947-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.