Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association

U.S. Supreme Court · decided May 14, 2018 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)

Decided
May 14, 2018
Term
October Term 2017
Vote
7–2
Majority author
Justice Alito
Issue area
Federalism
Disposition
Reversed
Outcome
Petitioning party won
Ideological direction
Conservative
Constitutional ruling
Federal law held unconstitutional

Opinion excerpt

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2017 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321 , 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus MURPHY, GOVERNOR OF NEW JERSEY, ET AL. v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSN. ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 16–476. Argued December 4, 2017—Decided May 14, 2018* The Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA) makes it unlawful for a State or its subdivisions “to sponsor, operate, adver- tise, promote, license, or authorize by law or compact . . . a lottery, sweepstakes, or other betting, gambling, or wagering scheme based . . . on” competitive sporting events, 28 U.S. C . §3702(1), and for “a person to sponsor, operate, advertise, or promote” those same gam- bling schemes if done “pursuant to the law or compact of a govern- mental entity,” §3702(2). But PASPA does not make sports gambling itself a federal crime. Instead, it allows the Attorney General, as well as professional and amateur sports organizations, to bring civil ac- tions to enjoin violations. §3703.…

Excerpt of a 92,782-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.

← Back to the decisions database