Mullane, Special Guardian, v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., Trustee, et al. (339 U.S. 306)

U.S. Supreme Court · decided April 24, 1950 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)

Citation
339 U.S. 306 · 70 S. Ct. 652
Docket
No. 378
Argued
February 8, 1950
Decided
April 24, 1950
Term
October Term 1949
Vote
7–1
Majority author
Justice Jackson (R.H.)
Issue area
Due Process
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome
Petitioning party won
Ideological direction
Liberal
Constitutional ruling
State/territorial law held unconstitutional

How the Justices voted

Majority
Chief Justice Vinson, Justice Minton, Justice Clark, Justice R. H. Jackson (wrote), Justice Frankfurter, Justice Reed, Justice Black
Dissenting
Justice Burton (wrote)

Opinion on Justia

Opinion excerpt

Mk. Justice Jackson delivered the opinion of the Court. This controversy questions the constitutional sufficiency of notice to beneficiaries on judicial settlement of accounts by the trustee of a common trust fund established under the New York Banking Law. The New York Court of Appeals considered and overruled objections that the statutory notice contravenes requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment and that by allowance of the account beneficiaries were deprived of property without due process of law. 299 N. Y. 697, 87 N. E. 2d 73. The case is here on appeal under 28 U. S. C. § 1257. Common trust fund legislation is addressed to a problem appropriate for state action. Mounting overheads have made administration of small trusts undesirable to corporate trustees. In order that donors and testators of moderately sized trusts may not be denied the service of corporate fiduciaries, the District of Columbia and some thirty states other than New York have permitted pooling small trust estates into one fund for investment administration. The income, capital gains, losses and expenses of the collective trust are shared by the constituent trusts in proportion to their contribution. By this plan, diversification of risk and economy of management can be extended to those whose capital standing alone would not obtain such advantage. Statutory authorization for the establishment of such…

Excerpt of a 26,444-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.

← Back to the decisions database