Mills v. Habluetzel (456 U.S. 91)

U.S. Supreme Court · decided April 5, 1982 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)

Citation
456 U.S. 91 · 102 S. Ct. 1549
Decided
April 5, 1982
Term
October Term 1981
Vote
9–0
Majority author
Justice Rehnquist
Issue area
Civil Rights
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome
Petitioning party won
Ideological direction
Liberal
Constitutional ruling
State/territorial law held unconstitutional

Opinion excerpt

Justice Rehnquist delivered the opinion of the Court. This Court has held that once a State posits a judicially enforceable right of children to support from their natural fathers, the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits the State from denying that same right to illegitimate children. Gomez v. Perez, 409 U. S. 535 (1973). In this case we are required to determine the extent to which the right of illegitimate children recognized in Gomez may be circumscribed by a State’s interest in avoiding the prosecution of stale or fraudulent claims. The Texas Court of Civil Appeals, Thirteenth Supreme Judicial District, upheld against federal constitutional challenges the State’s one-year statute of limitation for suits to identify the natural fathers of illegitimate children. We noted probable jurisdiction. 451 U. S. 936. We begin by reviewing the history of the statute challenged by appellant. I Like all States, Texas imposes upon parents the primary responsibility for support of their legitimate children. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. (Code) §§4.02, 12.04(3) (1975 and Supp. 1982). That duty extends beyond the dissolution of marriage, Code § 14.05, regardless of whether the parent has custody of the child, Hooten v. Hooten, 15 S. W. 2d 141 (Tex. Civ. App. 1929), and may be enforced on the child’s behalf in civil proceedings. Code § 14.05(a). Prior to our decision in…

Excerpt of a 32,671-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.

← Back to the decisions database