Masterpiece Cakeshop, LTD. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission

U.S. Supreme Court · decided June 4, 2018 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)

Decided
June 4, 2018
Docket
No. 16-111
Argued
December 5, 2017
Term
October Term 2017
Vote
7–2
Majority author
Justice Kennedy
Issue area
Civil Rights
Disposition
Reversed
Outcome
Petitioning party won
Ideological direction
Conservative

How the Justices voted

Majority
Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Kennedy (wrote), Justice Breyer (joined a concurrence), Justice Alito (joined a concurrence), Justice Kagan (wrote a concurrence), Justice Gorsuch (wrote a concurrence)
Concurring in the judgment
Justice Thomas (wrote)
Dissenting
Justice Ginsburg (wrote), Justice Sotomayor

Oral argument transcript and advocates

Opinion excerpt

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2017 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321 , 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus MASTERPIECE CAKESHOP, LTD., ET AL. v. COLORADO CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF COLORADO No. 16–111. Argued December 5, 2017—Decided June 4, 2018 Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd., is a Colorado bakery owned and operated by Jack Phillips, an expert baker and devout Christian. In 2012 he told a same-sex couple that he would not create a cake for their wed- ding celebration because of his religious opposition to same-sex mar- riages—marriages that Colorado did not then recognize—but that he would sell them other baked goods, e.g., birthday cakes. The couple filed a charge with the Colorado Civil Rights Commission (Commis- sion) pursuant to the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act (CADA), which prohibits, as relevant here, discrimination based on sexual ori- entation in a “place of business engaged in any sales to the public and any place offering services . . . to the public.” Under CADA’s admin-…

Excerpt of a 119,019-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.

← Back to the decisions database