Ledure v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
U.S. Supreme Court · decided April 28, 2022 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)
- Decided
- April 28, 2022
- Term
- October Term 2021
- Vote
- 4–4
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome
- Petitioning party lost
- Ideological direction
- Conservative
Opinion excerpt
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 596 U. S. Part 1 Page 242 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT April 28, 2022 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D.C. 20543, pio@supremecourt.gov, of any typographical or other formal errors. Per Curiam LeDURE v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the seventh circuit No. 20–807. Argued March 28, 2022—Decided April 28, 2022 962 F. 3d 907, affrmed by an equally divided Court. David C. Frederick argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Bradley E. Oppenheimer, Nelson G. Wolff, and Jerome J. Schlichter. Colleen E. Roh Sinzdak argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae supporting petitioner. With her on the brief were Solicitor General Prelogar, Acting Assistant Attorney General Boynton, Deputy Solicitor General Kneedler, Daniel Tenny, Joshua M. Koppel, Paul M. Geier, Paula Lee, and Rebecca S. Behravesh. PJa. Sgcoett BPallreongoer fa rPgueed nthed cianusge f orP reuspbonldiecnta. tWioitnh him on the brief were Tyce R. Walters, J. Timothy Eaton, and Jonathan B. Amarilio.* Per Curiam. The judgment is affrmed by an equally divided Court.…
Excerpt of a 2,689-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.