Jungersen v. Ostby & Barton Co. et al. (335 U.S. 560)

U.S. Supreme Court · decided January 3, 1949 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)

Citation
335 U.S. 560 · 69 S. Ct. 269
Docket
No. 7
Argued
November 10, 1948
Decided
January 3, 1949
Term
October Term 1948
Vote
6–3
Majority author
Justice Reed
Issue area
Economic Activity
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome
Petitioning party lost
Ideological direction
Liberal

How the Justices voted

Majority
Chief Justice Vinson, Justice Douglas, Justice Reed (wrote), Justice Black, Justice Rutledge, Justice Murphy
Dissenting
Justice Burton, Justice R. H. Jackson (wrote), Justice Frankfurter (wrote)

Opinion on Justia

Opinion excerpt

Me. Justice Reed delivered the opinion of the Court. The issue here is the validity of United States Patent No. 2,118,468 which covers a “method of casting articles of intricate design and a product thereof.” The patent was granted to Jungersen on May 24, 1938. In 1941, Ostby and Barton Company instituted in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey an action for a declaratory judgment that the patent was invalid and not infringed. Jungersen, by counterclaim, alleged infringement and sought an injunction. The District Court held Claims 1-4 valid but not infringed and Claims 5-6 invalid because too broad. 65 F. Supp. 652. The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed on the reasoning of the District Court. 163 F. 2d 312. We denied petitions by both parties for certiorari. 332 U. S. 851, 852. In 1944, Jungersen filed suit against Baden in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, in which he alleged infringement of the patent and sought damages, profits, and injunctive relief. That court held all the claims invalid. 69 F. Supp. 922. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed. 166 F. 2d 807. Vacating the prior orders which denied it in the Ostby and Barton proceeding, we granted certiorari in both cases in order to settle the conflict. 334 U. S. 835. Since the parties do not assert…

Excerpt of a 19,862-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.

← Back to the decisions database