Jennifer M. Granholm, Governor of Michigan, et al. v. Eleanor Heald, et al. (544 U.S. 460)

U.S. Supreme Court · decided May 16, 2005 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)

Citation
544 U.S. 460 · 125 S. Ct. 1885
Decided
May 16, 2005
Term
October Term 2004
Vote
5–4
Majority author
Justice Kennedy
Issue area
Economic Activity
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome
Petitioning party lost
Ideological direction
Liberal
Constitutional ruling
State/territorial law held unconstitutional

Opinion excerpt

Justice Kennedy delivered the opinion of the Court. These consolidated cases present challenges to state laws regulating the sale of wine from out-of-state wineries to consumers in Michigan and New York. The details and mechanics of the two regulatory schemes differ, but the object and effect of the laws are the same: to allow in-state wineries to sell wine directly to consumers in that State but to prohibit out-of-state wineries from doing so, or, at the least, to make direct sales impractical from an economic standpoint. It is evident that the object and design of the Michigan and New York statutes is to grant in-state wineries a competitive advantage over wineries located beyond the States’ borders.- We hold that the laws in both States discriminate against interstate commerce in violation of the Commerce Clause, Art. I, § 8, cl. 3, and that the discrimination is neither authorized nor permitted by the Twenty-first Amendment. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, which invalidated the Michigan laws; and we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which upheld the New York laws. i — I Like many other States, Michigan and New York regulate the sale and importation of alcoholic beverages, including wine, through a three-tier distribution system. Separate licenses are required for producers, wholesalers,…

Excerpt of a 54,507-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.

← Back to the decisions database