in re GRAND JURY (598 U.S. 15)
U.S. Supreme Court · decided January 23, 2023 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)
- Citation
- 598 U.S. 15 · 143 S. Ct. 543
- Decided
- January 23, 2023
- Term
- October Term 2022
- Vote
- 9–0
- Disposition
- Petition denied or appeal dismissed
- Outcome
- Petitioning party lost
Opinion excerpt
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 598 U. S. Part 1 Pages 15–16 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT January 23, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D.C. 20543, pio@supremecourt.gov, of any typographical or other formal errors. OCTOBER TERM, 2022 15 Per Curiam IN RE GRAND JURY certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit No. 21–1397. Argued January 9, 2023—Decided January 23, 2023 Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 23 F. 4th 1088 . Daniel B. Levin argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Donald B. Verrilli, Jr., J. Max Rosen, Rachel G. Miller-Ziegler, and Evan J. Davis. Masha G. Hansford argued the cause for the United States. With her on the brief were Solicitor General Prelo- gar, Deputy Assistant Attorney General Hubbert, Deputy Solicitor General Feigin, S. Robert Lyons, Joseph B. Syver- son, and Mark S. Determan.* Per Curiam. Page Proof Pending Publication The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. It is so ordered. *Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were fled for the American Bar Association by Deborah Enix-Ross and John M. Colvin; for the American College of Tax…
Excerpt of a 3,376-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.