Idaho, et al. v. Coeur D'alene Tribe of Idaho, Etc., et al. (521 U.S. 261)

U.S. Supreme Court · decided June 23, 1997 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)

Citation
521 U.S. 261 · 117 S. Ct. 2028
Decided
June 23, 1997
Term
October Term 1996
Vote
5–4
Majority author
Justice Kennedy
Issue area
Federalism
Disposition
Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part and remanded
Outcome
Petitioning party won
Ideological direction
Conservative

Opinion excerpt

Justice Kennedy announced the judgment of the Court and delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I, II-A, and III, and an opinion with respect to Parts II-B, II-C, and II-D, in which The Chief Justice joins. In the northern region of Idaho, close by the Coeur d’Alene Mountains which are part of Bitterroot Range, lies tranquil Lake Coeur d’Alene. One of the Nation’s most beautiful lakes, it is some 24 miles long and 1 to 3 miles wide. The Spokane River originates here and thence flows west, while the lake in turn is fed by other rivers and streams, including Coeur d’Alene River which flows to it from the east, as does the forested Saint Joe River which begins high in the Bitterroots and gathers their waters along its 130-mile journey. To the south of the lake lies the more populated part of the Coeur d’Alene Reservation. Whether the Coeur d’Alene Tribe’s ownership extends to the banks and submerged lands of the lake and various of these rivers and streams, or instead ownership is vested in the State of Idaho, is the underlying dispute. We are limited here, however, to the important, preliminary question whether the Eleventh Amendment bars a federal court from hearing the Tribe’s claim. I Alleging ownership in the submerged lands and bed of Lake Coeur d’Alene and of the various navigable rivers and streams that form part of its water system, the Coeur d’Alene…

Excerpt of a 49,169-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.

← Back to the decisions database