Hickman, Administrator, v. Taylor et al., Trading As Taylor & Anderson Towing & Lighterage Co., et al. (329 U.S. 495)
U.S. Supreme Court · decided January 13, 1947 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)
- Citation
- 329 U.S. 495 · 67 S. Ct. 385
- Decided
- January 13, 1947
- Term
- October Term 1946
- Vote
- 9–0
- Majority author
- Justice Murphy
- Issue area
- Privacy
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome
- Petitioning party lost
- Ideological direction
- Conservative
Opinion excerpt
Mr. Justice Murphy delivered the opinion of the Court. This case presents an important problem under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as to the extent to which a party may inquire into oral and written statements of witnesses, or other information, secured by an adverse party’s counsel in the course of preparation for possible litigation after a claim has arisen. Examination into a person’s files and records, including those resulting from the professional activities of an attorney, must be judged with care. It is not without reason that various safeguards have been established to preclude unwarranted excursions into the privacy of a man’s work. At the same time, public policy supports reasonable and necessary inquiries. Properly to balance these competing interests is a delicate and difficult task. On February 7, 1943, the tug “J. M. Taylor” sank while engaged in helping to tow a car float of the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad across the Delaware River at Philadelphia. The accident was apparently unusual in nature, the cause of it still being unknown. Five of the nine crew members were drowned. Three days later the tug owners and the underwriters employed a law firm, of which respondent Fortenbaugh is a member, to defend them against potential suits by representatives of the deceased crew members and to sue the railroad for damages to the tug. A public hearing was held on…
Excerpt of a 44,286-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.