Hickman, Administrator, v. Taylor et al., Trading As Taylor & Anderson Towing & Lighterage Co., et al. (329 U.S. 495)

U.S. Supreme Court · decided January 13, 1947 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)

Citation
329 U.S. 495 · 67 S. Ct. 385
Docket
No. 47
Argued
November 13, 1946
Decided
January 13, 1947
Term
October Term 1946
Vote
9–0
Majority author
Justice Murphy
Issue area
Privacy
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome
Petitioning party lost
Ideological direction
Conservative

How the Justices voted

Majority
Chief Justice Vinson, Justice Burton, Justice Douglas, Justice Reed, Justice Black, Justice Rutledge, Justice Murphy (wrote)
Concurring in the judgment
Justice R. H. Jackson (wrote), Justice Frankfurter

Opinion on Justia

Opinion excerpt

Mr. Justice Murphy delivered the opinion of the Court. This case presents an important problem under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as to the extent to which a party may inquire into oral and written statements of witnesses, or other information, secured by an adverse party’s counsel in the course of preparation for possible litigation after a claim has arisen. Examination into a person’s files and records, including those resulting from the professional activities of an attorney, must be judged with care. It is not without reason that various safeguards have been established to preclude unwarranted excursions into the privacy of a man’s work. At the same time, public policy supports reasonable and necessary inquiries. Properly to balance these competing interests is a delicate and difficult task. On February 7, 1943, the tug “J. M. Taylor” sank while engaged in helping to tow a car float of the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad across the Delaware River at Philadelphia. The accident was apparently unusual in nature, the cause of it still being unknown. Five of the nine crew members were drowned. Three days later the tug owners and the underwriters employed a law firm, of which respondent Fortenbaugh is a member, to defend them against potential suits by representatives of the deceased crew members and to sue the railroad for damages to the tug. A public hearing was held on…

Excerpt of a 44,286-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.

← Back to the decisions database