Glen Whorton, Director, Nevada Department of Corrections v. Marvin Howard Bockting (549 U.S. 406)

U.S. Supreme Court · decided February 28, 2007 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)

Citation
549 U.S. 406 · 127 S. Ct. 1173
Decided
February 28, 2007
Term
October Term 2006
Vote
9–0
Majority author
Justice Alito
Issue area
Criminal Procedure
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome
Petitioning party won
Ideological direction
Conservative

Opinion excerpt

127 S. Ct. 1173 (2007) Glen WHORTON, Director, Nevada Department of Corrections, Petitioner, v. Marvin Howard BOCKTING. No. 05-595. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 1, 2006. Decided February 28, 2007. *1176 Attorney General George J. Chanos, for petitioner, by Irving L. Gornstein for the United States as amicus curiae, by special leave of the Court, supporting the petitioner. Frances A. Forsman, Las Vegas, NV, for respondent. George J. Chanos, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, Gerald Gardner, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Counsel of Record, Victor-Hugo Schulze, II, Senior Deputy Attorney General, Rene L. Hulse, Senior Deputy Attorney General, Las Vegas, NV, for Petitioner. Franny A. Forsman, Counsel of Record, Federal Public Defender, Michael Pescetta, Assistant Federal Public Defender for District of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, for Respondent. *1177 Justice ALITO delivered the opinion of the Court. This case presents the question whether, under the rules set out in Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288 , 109 S. Ct. 1060 , 103 L. Ed. 2d 334 (1989), our decision in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 , 124 S. Ct. 1354 , 158 L. Ed. 2d 177 (2004), is retroactive to cases already final on direct review. We hold that it is not. I A Respondent Marvin Bockting lived in Las Vegas, Nevada, with his wife, Laura Bockting, their 3-year-old daughter Honesty, and Laura's…

Excerpt of a 26,752-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.

← Back to the decisions database