Garland v. Ming Dai
U.S. Supreme Court · decided June 1, 2021 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)
- Decided
- June 1, 2021
- Term
- October Term 2020
- Vote
- 9–0
- Majority author
- Justice Gorsuch
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome
- Petitioning party won
- Ideological direction
- Conservative
Opinion excerpt
6/1/2021 11:20:11 AM Compare Results Old File: New File: 19-1155.pdf 19-1155_new.pdf versus 18 pages (125 KB) 18 pages (123 KB) 5/28/2021 1:30:37 PM 6/1/2021 11:19:41 AM Total Changes Content Styling and Annotations 3 3 Replacements 0 Styling 0 Insertions 0 Annotations 0 Deletions Go to First Change (page 1) file://NoURLProvided[6/1/2021 11:20:11 AM] (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2020 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321 , 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL v. MING DAI CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT No. 19–1155. Argued February 23, 2021—Decided June 1, 2021* In each of these cases, a foreign national appeared before an immigration judge (IJ) and requested that he not be returned to his country of origin. For Cesar Alcaraz-Enriquez, the IJ first had to determine whether Mr. Alcaraz-Enriquez had committed a disqualifying “partic- ularly serious crime” based on his prior California conviction for “in- flicting corporal injury on a spouse or cohabitant.” See 8 U. S. C.…
Excerpt of a 37,085-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.