Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto RICO v. Aurelius Investment, LLC
U.S. Supreme Court · decided June 1, 2020 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)
- Decided
- June 1, 2020
- Term
- October Term 2019
- Vote
- 9–0
- Majority author
- Justice Breyer
- Issue area
- Federalism
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome
- Petitioning party won
- Ideological direction
- Liberal
Opinion excerpt
Justice BREYER delivered the opinion of the Court. The Constitution's Appointments Clause says that the President "shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate , shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States ...." Art. II, § 2, cl. 2 (emphasis added). In 2016, Congress enacted the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (PROMESA). 130 Stat. 549, 48 U.S.C. § 2101 et seq. That Act created a Financial Oversight and Management Board, and it provided, as relevant here, that the President could appoint its seven members without "the advice and consent of the Senate," i.e. , without Senate confirmation. The question before us is whether this method of appointment violates the Constitution's Senate confirmation requirement. In our view, the Appointments Clause governs the appointments of all officers of the United States, including those located in Puerto Rico. Yet two provisions of the Constitution empower Congress to create local offices for the District of Columbia and for Puerto Rico and the Territories. See Art. I, § 8, cl. 17 ; Art. IV, § 3, cl. 2. And the Clause's term "Officers of the United States" has never been understood to cover those whose powers and duties are primarily local in nature and derive from these two constitutional…
Excerpt of a 106,411-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.