Federal Trade Commission v. Morton Salt Co. (334 U.S. 37)

U.S. Supreme Court · decided May 3, 1948 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)

Citation
334 U.S. 37 · 68 S. Ct. 822
Docket
No. 464
Argued
March 10, 1948
Decided
May 3, 1948
Term
October Term 1947
Vote
7–2
Majority author
Justice Black
Issue area
Economic Activity
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome
Petitioning party won
Ideological direction
Liberal

How the Justices voted

Majority
Chief Justice Vinson, Justice Burton, Justice Douglas, Justice Reed, Justice Black (wrote), Justice Rutledge, Justice Murphy
Dissenting
Justice R. H. Jackson (wrote), Justice Frankfurter

Opinion on Justia

Opinion excerpt

Mr. Justice Black delivered the opinion of the Court. The Federal Trade Commission, after a hearing, found that the respondent, which manufactures and sells table salt in interstate commerce, had discriminated in price between different purchasers of like grades and qualities, and concluded that such discriminations were in violation of § 2 of the Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 730, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, 49 Stat. 1526,15 U. S. C. § 13. It accordingly issued a cease and desist order. 39 F. T. C. 35. Upon petition of the respondent the Circuit Court of Appeals, with one judge dissenting, set aside the Commission’s findings and order, directed the Commission to dismiss its complaint against respondent, and denied a cross petition of the Commission for enforcement of its order. 162 F. 2d 949. The Court’s judgment rested on its construction of the Act, its holding that crucial findings of the Commission were either not supported by evidence or were contrary to the evidence, and its conclusion that the Commission’s order was too broad. Since questions of importance in the construction and administration of the Act were presented, we granted certiorari. 332 U. S. 850. Disposition of these questions requires only a brief narration of the facts. Respondent manufactures several different brands of table salt and sells them directly to (1) wholesalers or jobbers, who in turn…

Excerpt of a 43,717-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.

← Back to the decisions database