Federal Power Commission v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. (347 U.S. 239)

U.S. Supreme Court · decided March 15, 1954 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)

Citation
347 U.S. 239 · 74 S. Ct. 487
Docket
No. 28
Argued
October 15, 1953
Decided
March 15, 1954
Term
October Term 1953
Vote
4–3
Majority author
Justice Burton
Issue area
Economic Activity
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome
Petitioning party lost
Ideological direction
Conservative

How the Justices voted

Majority
Chief Justice Warren, Justice Clark, Justice Frankfurter, Justice Burton (wrote)
Dissenting
Justice Black, Justice Douglas (wrote), Justice Minton

Opinion on Justia

Opinion excerpt

Mr. Justice Burton delivered the opinion of the Court. The most significant issue raised by this case is whether the Federal Water Power Act of 1920 has abolished private proprietary rights, existing under state law, to use waters of a navigable stream for power purposes. We agree with the Court of Appeals that it has not. We agree also that in computing a federal licensee’s amortization reserve, required by § 10 (d) of that Act, as amended, the Federal Power Commission was not justified in disallowing the expenses paid or incurred by the licensee in this ease for the use of such rights. March 2, 1921, Niagara Falls Power Company, a New York corporation, predecessor in interest of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, a New York corporation, respondent herein, secured from the Federal Power Commission the federal license with which we are concerned. It was the first such license issued under the Federal Water Power Act of 1920. Its term was 50 years. It authorized the diversion of water for power purposes from the Niagara River, above the Falls, and the return of it below the Falls, all in New York. The daily diversion, in the aggregate, could not exceed 19,500 cubic feet per second (c.f. s.). Section 10 (d) of the Act requires each licensee, after 20 years of operation under such a license, to establish and maintain amortization reserves out of any surplus thereafter earned and…

Excerpt of a 36,072-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.

← Back to the decisions database