Estate of Spiegel et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (335 U.S. 701)

U.S. Supreme Court · decided January 17, 1949 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)

Citation
335 U.S. 701 · 69 S. Ct. 301
Docket
No. 3
Argued
October 24, 1947; reargued October 11, 1948
Decided
January 17, 1949
Term
October Term 1948
Vote
6–3
Majority author
Justice Black
Issue area
Federal Taxation
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome
Petitioning party lost
Ideological direction
Liberal

How the Justices voted

Majority
Chief Justice Vinson, Justice Douglas, Justice Black (wrote), Justice Rutledge, Justice Murphy
Concurring in the judgment
Justice Reed (wrote)
Dissenting
Justice Burton (wrote), Justice R. H. Jackson, Justice Frankfurter (wrote)

Opinion on Justia

Opinion excerpt

Mr. Justice Black delivered the opinion of the Court. This is a federal estate tax controversy. Here, as in Commissioner v. Church, ante, p. 632, we granted cer-tiorari to consider questions dependent upon the meaning and application of a provision of § 811 (c) of the Internal Revenue Code. 47 Stat. 169, 279, as amended, 26 U. S. C. §811 (c). The particular provision requires including in a decedent’s gross estate the value at his death of all property “To the extent of any interest therein of which the decedent has at any time made a transfer, by trust or otherwise . . . intended to take effect in possession or enjoyment at or after his death In 1920 Sidney M. Spiegel, a resident of Illinois, made a transfer by trust of certain stocks to himself and another. He died in 1940. During his life the trust income was to be divided among his three children; if they did not survive him, to any of their surviving children. On his death the trust provided that the corpus was to be distributed in the same manner. But no provision was made for distribution of the corpus and its accumulated income should Mr. Spiegel survive all of his children and grandchildren. For this reason the Government has contended that under controlling state law the property would have reverted to Mr. Spiegel had he survived his designated beneficiaries. The value of the corpus of this trust was not included in…

Excerpt of a 84,353-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.

← Back to the decisions database