Eric J. Weiss v. United States (510 U.S. 163)
U.S. Supreme Court · decided January 19, 1994 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)
- Citation
- 510 U.S. 163 · 114 S. Ct. 752
- Decided
- January 19, 1994
- Term
- October Term 1993
- Vote
- 9–0
- Majority author
- Justice Rehnquist
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome
- Petitioning party lost
- Ideological direction
- Conservative
Opinion excerpt
Chief Justice Rehnquist delivered the opinion of the Court. We must decide in these cases whether the current method of appointing military judges violates the Appointments Clause of the Constitution, and whether the lack of a fixed term of office for military judges violates the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause. We conclude that neither constitutional provision is violated. Petitioner Weiss, a United States Marine, pleaded guilty at a special court-martial to one count of larceny, in violation of Article 121 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ or Code), 10 U. S. C. § 921. He was sentenced to three months of confinement, partial forfeiture of pay, and a bad-conduct discharge. Petitioner Hernandez, also a Marine, pleaded guilty to the possession, importation, and distribution of cocaine, in violation of Article 112a, UCMJ, 10 U. S. C. § 912a, and conspiracy, in violation of Article 81, UCMJ, 10 U. S. C. §881. He was sentenced to 25 years of confinement, forfeiture of all pay, a reduction in rank, and a dishonorable discharge. The convening authority reduced Hernandez’ sentence to 20 years of confinement. The Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review, in separate appeals, affirmed petitioners’ convictions. The Court of Military Appeals granted plenary review in petitioner Weiss’ case to address his contention that the judges in his case had no authority to…
Excerpt of a 33,697-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.