Eastman Kodak Company v. Image Technical Services, Inc., et al. (504 U.S. 451)
U.S. Supreme Court · decided June 8, 1992 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)
- Citation
- 504 U.S. 451 · 112 S. Ct. 2072
- Decided
- June 8, 1992
- Term
- October Term 1991
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority author
- Justice Blackmun
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome
- Petitioning party lost
- Ideological direction
- Liberal
Opinion excerpt
Justice Blackmun delivered the opinion of the Court. This is yet another case that concerns the standard for summary judgment in an antitrust controversy. The principal issue here is whether a defendant’s lack of market power in the primary equipment market precludes — as a matter of law — the possibility of market power in derivative aftermarkets. Petitioner Eastman Kodak Company manufactures and sells photocopiers and micrographic equipment. Kodak also sells service and replacement parts for its equipment. Respondents are 18 independent service organizations (ISO’s) that in the early 1980’s began servicing Kodak copying and micrographic equipment. Kodak subsequently adopted policies to limit the availability of parts to ISO’s and to make it more difficult for ISO’s to compete with Kodak in servicing Kodak equipment. Respondents instituted this action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging that Kodak’s policies were unlawful under both § 1 and § 2 of the Sherman Act, 26 Stat. 209, as amended, 15 U. S. C. §§ 1 and 2 (1988 ed., Supp. II). After truncated discovery, the District Court granted summary judgment for Kodak. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed. The appellate court found that respondents had presented sufficient evidence to raise a genuine issue concerning Kodak’s market power in the service and parts…
Excerpt of a 66,542-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.