Dixon v. Duffy, Warden (342 U.S. 33)

U.S. Supreme Court · decided November 5, 1951 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)

Citation
342 U.S. 33 · 72 S. Ct. 10
Docket
No. 79
Argued
October 16, 1951
Decided
November 5, 1951
Term
October Term 1951
Vote
7–1
Issue area
Judicial Power
Disposition
Stay, petition, or motion granted
Outcome
Petitioning party lost
Ideological direction
Conservative

How the Justices voted

Majority
Chief Justice Vinson, Justice Clark, Justice Burton, Justice R. H. Jackson, Justice Frankfurter, Justice Reed, Justice Black
Dissenting
Justice Douglas

Opinion on Justia

Opinion excerpt

Per Curiam. Petitioner was convicted in the California Superior Court in 1949 of making and possessing counterfeiting dies or plates in violation of Cal. Penal Code, 1949, § 480. He did not appeal, but sought to challenge the validity of his conviction by filing successive petitions for a writ of habeas corpus in the California Superior Court and California District Court of Appeal. Following denial of these petitions, he instituted this case by filing an original petition' for a writ of habeas corpus in the Supreme Court of California. The Supreme Court of California denied the petition without opinion, two justices thereof voting for issuance of the writ. We granted certiorari, 341 U. S. 938, because of a serious claim that petitioner had been deprived of his rights under the Federal Constitution. At the bar of this Court, the Attorney General of the State of California argued that habeas corpus was not a proper state remedy for determination of petitioner’s federal claim. It is the position of the Attorney General that petitioner’s failure to appeal in this case barred him from seeking post-conviction relief by way of a collateral habeas corpus proceeding.. He admits that habeas corpus is available in California in cases involving certain exceptional circumstances, but contends that this is not such a case. If the Attorney General is correct, the judgment may rest on a…

Excerpt of a 2,078-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.

← Back to the decisions database