Darr v. Burford, Warden (339 U.S. 200)

U.S. Supreme Court · decided April 3, 1950 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)

Citation
339 U.S. 200 · 70 S. Ct. 587
Docket
No. 51
Argued
December 5, 1949
Decided
April 3, 1950
Term
October Term 1949
Vote
5–3
Majority author
Justice Reed
Issue area
Judicial Power
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome
Petitioning party lost
Ideological direction
Conservative
Precedent
This decision overruled or formally altered earlier precedent

How the Justices voted

Majority
Chief Justice Vinson, Justice Minton, Justice Clark (joined a concurrence), Justice Burton (wrote a concurrence), Justice Reed (wrote)
Dissenting
Justice R. H. Jackson, Justice Frankfurter (wrote), Justice Black

Opinion on Justia

Opinion excerpt

Mr. Justice Reed delivered the opinion of the Court. Petitioner Darr, an inmate of the Oklahoma state penitentiary, has been denied federal habeas corpus for failure to exhaust his other available remedies. Petitioner’s omission to apply here for certiorari from the state court’s denial of habeas corpus was held an error, fatal to consideration on the merits. Therefore the merits of petitioner’s claims of imprisonment in violation of the Constitution are not before us. The petition for certiorari requires us to pass solely upon the correctness of the lower court’s view that ordinarily a petition for certiorari must be made to this Court from a state court’s refusal of collateral relief before a federal district court will consider an application for habeas corpus on its merits. Petitioner was serving a term in the Oklahoma state penitentiary when, on November 28, 1930, he was summoned to appear in another Oklahoma county to plead to two separate charges of armed bank robbery. In January of 1931, he was tried by jury, and convicted on the first charge; petitioner then pleaded guilty to the second. He was sentenced to two terms of forty years each, to run consecutively, and the first sentence is now being served. No appeal from the conviction was taken, but in 1947 petitioner applied to the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals for habeas corpus. Judging only from the state…

Excerpt of a 71,854-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.

← Back to the decisions database