Daimlerchrysler Ag v. Bauman (571 U.S. 117)

U.S. Supreme Court · decided January 14, 2014 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)

Citation
571 U.S. 117 · 134 S. Ct. 746
Docket
No. 11-965
Argued
October 15, 2013
Decided
January 14, 2014
Term
October Term 2013
Vote
9–0
Majority author
Justice Ginsburg
Issue area
Due Process
Disposition
Reversed
Outcome
Petitioning party won
Ideological direction
Liberal

How the Justices voted

Majority
Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Scalia, Justice Kennedy, Justice Thomas, Justice Ginsburg (wrote), Justice Breyer, Justice Alito, Justice Kagan
Concurring in the judgment
Justice Sotomayor (wrote)

Oral argument transcript and advocates · Opinion on Justia

Opinion excerpt

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2013 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus DAIMLER AG v. BAUMAN ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT No. 11–965. Argued October 15, 2013—Decided January 14, 2014 Plaintiffs (respondents here) are twenty-two residents of Argentina who filed suit in California Federal District Court, naming as a defendant DaimlerChrysler Aktiengesellschaft (Daimler), a German public stock company that is the predecessor to petitioner Daimler AG. Their complaint alleges that Mercedes-Benz Argentina (MB Argenti- na), an Argentinian subsidiary of Daimler, collaborated with state se- curity forces during Argentina’s 1976–1983 “Dirty War” to kidnap, detain, torture, and kill certain MB Argentina workers, among them, plaintiffs or persons closely related to plaintiffs. Based on those alle- gations, plaintiffs asserted claims under the Alien Tort Statute and the Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991, as well as under California and Argentina law. Personal…

Excerpt of a 104,178-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.

← Back to the decisions database