Container Corporation of America v. Franchise Tax Board (463 U.S. 159)
U.S. Supreme Court · decided June 27, 1983 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)
- Citation
- 463 U.S. 159 · 103 S. Ct. 2933
- Decided
- June 27, 1983
- Term
- October Term 1982
- Vote
- 5–3
- Majority author
- Justice Brennan
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome
- Petitioning party lost
- Ideological direction
- Liberal
Opinion excerpt
Justice Brennan delivered the opinion of the Court. This is another appeal claiming that the application of a state taxing scheme violates the Due Process and Commerce Clauses of the Federal Constitution. California imposes a corporate franchise tax geared to income. In common with a large number of other States, it employs the “unitary business” principle and formula apportionment in applying that tax to corporations doing business both inside and outside the State. Appellant is a Delaware corporation headquartered in Illinois and doing business in California and elsewhere. It also has a number of overseas subsidiaries incorporated in the countries in which they operate. Appellee is the California authority charged with administering the State’s franchise tax. This appeal presents three questions for review: (1) Was it improper for appellee and the state courts to find that appellant and its overseas subsidiaries constituted a “unitary business” for purposes of the state tax? (2) Even if the unitary business finding was proper, do certain salient differences among national economies render the standard three-factor apportionment formula used by California so inaccurate as applied to the multinational enterprise consisting of appellant and its subsidiaries as to violate the constitutional requirement of “fair apportionment” ? (3) In any event, did California have an…
Excerpt of a 90,031-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.