Colorado Dept. of State v. Baca
U.S. Supreme Court · decided July 6, 2020 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)
- Decided
- July 6, 2020
- Docket
- No. 19-518
- Argued
- May 13, 2020
- Term
- October Term 2019
- Vote
- 8–0
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome
- Petitioning party won
- Ideological direction
- Liberal
How the Justices voted
- Majority
- Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Ginsburg, Justice Breyer, Justice Alito, Justice Kagan, Justice Gorsuch, Justice Kavanaugh
- Concurring in the judgment
- Justice Thomas
Oral argument transcript and advocates
Opinion excerpt
(Slip Opinion) Cite as: 591 U. S. ____ (2020) 1 Per Curiam NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash- ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 19–518 _________________ COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE, PETITIONER v. MICHEAL BACA, ET AL. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT [July 6, 2020] PER CURIAM. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is reversed for the reasons stated in Chiafalo v. Washington, ante, p. ___. It is so ordered. JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR took no part in the decision of this case. JUSTICE THOMAS concurs in the judgment for the reasons stated in his separate opinion in Chiafalo v. Washington, ante, p. ___.
Excerpt of a 1,043-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.