City of Edmonds v. Oxford House, Inc., et al. (514 U.S. 725)
U.S. Supreme Court · decided May 15, 1995 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)
- Citation
- 514 U.S. 725 · 115 S. Ct. 1776
- Decided
- May 15, 1995
- Term
- October Term 1994
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority author
- Justice Ginsburg
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome
- Petitioning party lost
- Ideological direction
- Liberal
Opinion excerpt
Justice Ginsburg delivered the opinion of the Court. The Fair Housing Act (FHA or Act) prohibits discrimination in housing against, inter alijos, persons with handicaps. Section 807(b)(1) of the Act entirely exempts from the FHA’s compass “any reasonable local, State, or Federal restrictions regarding the maximum number of occupants permitted to occupy a dwelling.” 42 U. S. C. § 3607(b)(1). This case presents the question whether a provision in petitioner City of Edmonds’ zoning code qualifies for §3607(b)(l)’s complete exemption from FHA scrutiny. The provision, governing areas zoned for single-family dwelling units, defines “family” as “persons [without regard to number] related by genetics, adoption, or marriage, or a group of five or fewer [unrelated] persons.” Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) §21.30.010 (1991). The defining provision at issue describes who may compose a family unit; it does not prescribe “the maximum number of occupants” a dwelling unit may house. We hold that § 3607(b)(1) does not exempt prescriptions of the family-defining kind, i. e., provisions designed to foster the family character of a neighborhood. Instead, § 3607(b)(l)’s absolute exemption removes from the FHA’s scope only total occupancy limits, i. e., numerical ceilings that serve to prevent overcrowding in living quarters. I In the summer of 1990, respondent Oxford House opened a…
Excerpt of a 21,288-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.