Christoffel v. United States (338 U.S. 84)

U.S. Supreme Court · decided June 27, 1949 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)

Citation
338 U.S. 84 · 69 S. Ct. 1447
Docket
No. 528
Argued
April 20, 1949
Decided
June 27, 1949
Term
October Term 1948
Vote
5–4
Majority author
Justice Murphy
Issue area
Criminal Procedure
Disposition
Reversed
Outcome
Petitioning party won
Ideological direction
Liberal

How the Justices voted

Majority
Justice Douglas, Justice Frankfurter, Justice Black, Justice Rutledge, Justice Murphy (wrote)
Dissenting
Chief Justice Vinson, Justice Burton, Justice R. H. Jackson (wrote), Justice Reed

Opinion on Justia

Opinion excerpt

Mr. Justice Murphy delivered the opinion of the Court. In March of 1947, the Committee on Education and Labor was, as it is now, a standing committee of the House of Representatives. During the first session of the 80th Congress it held frequent hearings on proposed amendments to the National Labor Relations Act. On March 1, 1947, petitioner appeared as a witness before the committee, under oath, and in the course of the proceedings was asked a series of questions directed to his political affiliations and associations. In his answers he unequivocally denied that he was a Communist or that he endorsed, supported or participated in Communist programs. As a result of these answers he was indicted for perjury under § 22-2501 of the District of Columbia Code, and after a trial by jury was convicted. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction, 84 U. S. App. D. C. 132, 171 F. 2d 1004, and we granted certiorari to review its validity. 336 U. S. 934. No question is raised as to the relevancy or propriety of the questions asked. Petitioner’s main contention is that the committee was not a “competent tribunal” within the meaning of the statute, in that a quorum of the committee was not present at the time of the incident on which the indictment was based. As to this, the record reveals the following: the Committee on Education and Labor consists of twenty-five members, of whom…

Excerpt of a 21,777-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.

← Back to the decisions database