Bernal v. Fainter, Secretary of State of Texas, et al. (467 U.S. 216)

U.S. Supreme Court · decided May 30, 1984 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)

Citation
467 U.S. 216 · 104 S. Ct. 2312
Decided
May 30, 1984
Term
October Term 1983
Vote
8–1
Majority author
Justice Marshall
Issue area
Civil Rights
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome
Petitioning party won
Ideological direction
Liberal
Constitutional ruling
State/territorial law held unconstitutional

Opinion excerpt

Justice Marshall delivered the opinion of the Court. The question posed by this case is whether a statute of the State of Texas violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution by denying aliens the opportunity to become notaries public. The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that the statute does not offend the Equal Protection Clause. We granted certiorari, 464 U. S. 1007 (1983), and now reverse. Petitioner, a native of Mexico, is a resident alien who has lived in the United States since 1961. He works as a paralegal for Texas Rural Legal Aid, Inc., helping migrant farm-workers on employment and civil rights matters. In order to administer oaths to these workers and to notarize their statements for use in civil litigation, petitioner applied in 1978 to become a notary public. Under Texas law, notaries public authenticate written instruments, administer oaths, and take out-of-court depositions. The Texas Secretary of State denied petitioner’s application because he failed to satisfy the statutory requirement that a notary public be a citizen of the United States. Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat. Ann., Art. 5949(2) (Vernon Supp. 1984) (hereafter Article 5949(2)). After an unsuccessful administrative appeal, petitioner brought suit in the Federal District Court, claiming that the citizenship requirement mandated by Article 5942(2)…

Excerpt of a 23,134-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.

← Back to the decisions database