Arthur S. Lujan, Labor Commissioner of California, et al. v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc. (532 U.S. 189)
U.S. Supreme Court · decided April 17, 2001 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)
- Citation
- 532 U.S. 189 · 121 S. Ct. 1446
- Decided
- April 17, 2001
- Term
- October Term 2000
- Vote
- 9–0
- Majority author
- Justice Rehnquist
- Issue area
- Due Process
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome
- Petitioning party won
- Ideological direction
- Conservative
Opinion excerpt
Chief Justice Rehnquist delivered the opinion of the Court. The California Labor Code (Code or Labor Code) authorizes the State to order withholding of payments due a contractor on a public works project if a subcontractor on the project fails to comply with certain Code requirements. The Code permits the contractor, in turn, to withhold similar sums from the subcontractor. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the relevant Code provisions violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because the statutory scheme does not afford the subcontractor a hearing before or after such action is taken. We granted certiorari, 581 U. S. 924 (2000), and we reverse. Petitioners are the California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE), the California Department of Industrial Relations, and several state officials in their official capacities. Respondent G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc. (G & G), is a fire-protection company that installs fire sprinkler systems. G & G served as a subcontractor on several California public works projects. “Public works” include construction work done under contract and paid for in whole or part by public funds. Cal. Lab. Code Ann. § 1720 (West Supp. 2001). The department, board, authority, officer, or agent awarding a contract for public work is called the “awarding body.” § 1722 (West 1989). The California Labor Code requires…
Excerpt of a 16,622-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.