Arizona v. City and County of San Francisco, California
U.S. Supreme Court · decided June 15, 2022 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)
- Decided
- June 15, 2022
- Term
- October Term 2021
- Vote
- 9–0
- Disposition
- Petition denied or appeal dismissed
- Outcome
- Petitioning party lost
Opinion excerpt
(Slip Opinion) Cite as: 596 U. S. ____ (2022) 1 Per Curiam NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash- ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 20–1775 _________________ ARIZONA, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT [June 15, 2022] PER CURIAM. The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. It is so ordered. Cite as: 596 U. S. ____ (2022) 1 ROBERTS, C. J., concurring SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 20–1775 _________________ ARIZONA, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT [June 15, 2022] CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS, with whom JUSTICE THOMAS, JUSTICE ALITO, and JUSTICE GORSUCH join, concurring. This case involves a regulation known as the Public Charge Rule, promulgated by the Department of Homeland Security in 2019. See 84 Fed. Reg. 41292 (2019). The Rule set out the…
Excerpt of a 5,574-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.