Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club Pac, et al., Petitioners v. Ken Bennett, in His Official Capacity As Arizona Secretary of State, et al. (564 U.S. 721)

U.S. Supreme Court · decided June 27, 2011 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)

Citation
564 U.S. 721 · 131 S. Ct. 2806
Decided
June 27, 2011
Term
October Term 2010
Vote
5–4
Majority author
Justice Roberts
Issue area
First Amendment
Disposition
Reversed
Outcome
Petitioning party won
Ideological direction
Conservative
Constitutional ruling
State/territorial law held unconstitutional

Opinion excerpt

Chief Justice Roberts delivered the opinion of the Court. Under Arizona law, candidates for state office who accept public financing can receive additional money from the State in direct response to the campaign activities of privately financed candidates and independent expenditure groups. Once a set spending limit is exceeded, a publicly financed candidate receives roughly one dollar for every dollar spent by an opposing privately financed candidate. The publicly financed candidate also receives roughly one dollar for every dollar spent by independent expenditure groups to support the privately financed candidate, or to oppose the publicly financed candidate. We hold that Arizona’s matching funds scheme substantially burdens protected political speech without serving a compelling state interest and therefore violates the First Amendment. I A The Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Act, passed by initiative in 1998, created a voluntary public financing system to fund the primary and general election campaigns of candidates for state office. See Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. §16-940 et seq. (West 2006 and Supp. 2010). All eligible candidates for Governor, secretary of state, attorney general, treasurer, superintendent of public instruction, the corporation commission, mine inspector, and the state legislature (both the House and Senate) may opt to receive public funding. § 16-950(D)…

Excerpt of a 55,608-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.

← Back to the decisions database