Anderson v. City of Bessemer City, North Carolina (470 U.S. 564)
U.S. Supreme Court · decided March 19, 1985 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)
- Citation
- 470 U.S. 564 · 105 S. Ct. 1504
- Decided
- March 19, 1985
- Term
- October Term 1984
- Vote
- 9–0
- Majority author
- Justice White
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome
- Petitioning party won
- Ideological direction
- Liberal
Opinion excerpt
Justice White delivered the opinion of the Court. In Pullman-Standard v. Swint, 456 U. S. 273 (1982), we held that a District Court’s finding of discriminatory intent in an action brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 253, as amended, 42 U. S. C. §2000e et seq., is a factual finding that may be overturned on appeal only if it is clearly erroneous. In this case, the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit concluded that there was clear error in a District Court’s finding of discrimination and reversed. Because our reading of the record convinces us that the Court of Appeals misapprehended and misapplied the clearly-erroneous standard, we reverse. H Early m 1975, officials of respondent Bessemer City, North Carolina, set about to hire a new Recreation Director for the city. Although the duties that went with the position were not precisely delineated, the new Recreation Director was to be responsible for managing all of the city’s recreational facilities and for developing recreational programs — athletic and otherwise — to serve the needs of the city’s residents. A five-member committee selected by the Mayor was responsible for choosing the Recreation Director. Of the five members, four were men; the one woman on the committee, Mrs. Auddie Boone, served as the chairperson. Eight persons applied for the position of Recreation Director. Petitioner, at…
Excerpt of a 32,742-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.