Alstate Construction Co. v. Durkin, Secretary of Labor (345 U.S. 13)

U.S. Supreme Court · decided March 9, 1953 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)

Citation
345 U.S. 13 · 73 S. Ct. 565
Docket
No. 296
Argued
February 2, 1953
Decided
March 9, 1953
Term
October Term 1952
Vote
7–2
Majority author
Justice Black
Issue area
Unions
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome
Petitioning party lost
Ideological direction
Liberal

How the Justices voted

Majority
Chief Justice Vinson, Justice Minton, Justice Clark, Justice Burton, Justice R. H. Jackson, Justice Reed, Justice Black (wrote)
Dissenting
Justice Douglas (wrote), Justice Frankfurter

Opinion on Justia

Opinion excerpt

Mr. Justice Black delivered the opinion of the Court. Section 7 (a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act requires employers to pay each employee covered by the Act not less than one and one-half times his regular pay rate for every hour worked in excess of a forty-hour week; § 11 (c) requires employers to keep appropriate employment records. Employees covered are defined as those “engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce.” We have held that employees repairing interstate roads or railroads are “engaged in commerce” within the meaning of that clause of § 7 (a). The question presented in this case is whether employees who work off such roads in the production of materials to repair them are engaged “in the production of goods for commerce” within the meaning of § 7 (a). The Wage and Hour Administrator sued in District Court to enjoin the petitioner Alstate Construction Company from violating the overtime and record-keeping provisions of the Act. The District Court found: Al-state is a Pennsylvania road contractor that reconstructs and repairs roads, railroads, parkways and like facilities in that state. The company also manufactures at three Pennsylvania plants a bituminous concrete road surfacing mixture called amesite made from materials either bought or quarried in Pennsylvania. Most of it is applied to Pennsylvania roads either by Alstate’s own employees or…

Excerpt of a 8,498-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.

← Back to the decisions database