Alexander Haig, et al. v. Gladys Bissonette et al. (485 U.S. 264)

U.S. Supreme Court · decided March 21, 1988 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)

Citation
485 U.S. 264 · 108 S. Ct. 1253
Decided
March 21, 1988
Term
October Term 1987
Vote
5–0
Issue area
Judicial Power
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome
Petitioning party lost
Ideological direction
Conservative

Opinion excerpt

Per Curiam. Because the Court lacks a quorum, 28 U. S. C. § 1, and since a majority of the qualified Justices are of the opinion that the case cannot be heard and determined at the next Term of the Court, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit is affirmed under 28 U. S. C. § 2109, which provides that under these circumstances the Court shall enter its order affirming the judgment of the court from which the case was brought for review with the same effect as upon affirmance by an equally divided Court. The Chief Justice, Justice O’Connor, Justice Scalia, and Justice Kennedy took no part in this decision.

Excerpt of a 646-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.

← Back to the decisions database