Pung v. Isabella County, Michigan (25-95)
- Term
- OT 2025
- Argued
- 2026-02-25
Question Presented
Whether taking and selling a home to satisfy a government debt and keeping the surplus value as a windfall violates the Takings Clause when compensation is based on the artificially depressed auction sale price rather than fair market value; and whether such forfeiture constitutes an excessive fine under the Eighth Amendment when the debt was never actually owed.
Model prediction
Pung 7-2 (70% confidence).
Interactive oral-argument transcript · All OT 2025 cases
This static summary is shown when JavaScript is disabled. The full interactive analysis loads above.